News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gold56

01/18/12 4:09 PM

#86117 RE: MarketGeometry #86113

You're totally wrong and WHY do you care what we do with our money?
Trying to save us?
icon url

WillyburgD

01/18/12 4:13 PM

#86125 RE: MarketGeometry #86113

No. If we JV'd w/ a major tomorrow on a 50/50 basis where they funded the drill program, we would rocket upward and, as drills began proving resources, we would continue upward, erasing all equity losses in a very short time frame.
icon url

scoreoneortwo

01/18/12 4:14 PM

#86127 RE: MarketGeometry #86113

It is dependent on the value and inherent value has gone up.

Last year we were much greater value pps. If you had said the above when it was over .075 how far on "downside" would you have said it would go.

In the last year we have had SRK reports,validation of BCSP and Tombstone and who knows about BH and looks like uranium will now be a plus so it does not have to go down we are in better shape.

Value should be much higher and negate any downside imo.
icon url

MineAllMine

01/18/12 4:14 PM

#86128 RE: MarketGeometry #86113

I can only tell you that I bought and own lots of shares of this company because they have 5 properties (calling Tombstone one property), all with tremendous potential. I've gambled that if even 3 of these prove to have anywhere near what preliminary testing and Z-tem indicate; and if we get even 50% of the profits in some type of JV on these, I will still make lots of money. I cannot prove any of this, but then that's why the stock is about 2 cents. I've felt this way before I ever found this board and, actually, I feel much better about this company than I did, say, in 2009 when I voted to increase authorized shares.