News Focus
News Focus
icon url

PhilipDrummond

01/13/12 4:22 PM

#69087 RE: NioStar #69085

I may have an order number from today. Maybe not. But I can assure you for less than $15 bucks, you can find out an order number since it seems to be troubling you so much.
icon url

thatguy157

01/13/12 6:29 PM

#69091 RE: NioStar #69085

I think BRAV will be coming in short on it's Projected Revenue for Q4 and will disappoint.




But you have said that the PPS is not factored into the projections themself. There for any increase in Q4 2011 from Q3 2011 would spike the PPS even if projections are not met (I believe projections will be met 700k revenue).


Anyone have an order number for 2012 ?



Yes I do.

Is BRAV on track to hit 900K in Q1 ?



I don't know can you tell me what the stores have done or will do? Or your average amount per order?


I don't see anyone jumping to submit an order number for evaluation.



I have not shown any research public anymore. Even still you say that your projections of 340k for Q4 would put the average order at $19.53 an order if the stores sold zero amounts for the entire Q4 (based on 17,407 orders for Q4). So my question is for you, what do you care what the order numbers are anyway by your calculations? You asked if it is 300 hundred a day. That would imply $5859 (with YOUR Q4 projections) a day @19.53 an order or $527,310 for Q1, but implied they would need that they would need that amount to hit 1 mil for the quarter. Please understand it is difficult to make an argument changing your mathematical equation. Show me how you factor in the order numbers to get to your projections. I have given you mine. Here is a start. You stated 340k for Q4 2011. I will tell you there were at Least 17,407 orders for onlyleggings.com (give or take several hours) during Q4 2011. Give me something to substantiate your claims. I have the same numbers you do. Let us see why we differ, but bear in mind we have to use same statistics for both quarters. No changing the equation.

Not a good sign IMO.



Depends on the math..........


GLTA
GO BRAV
icon url

growthstocks

01/13/12 8:45 PM

#69092 RE: NioStar #69085

so far, Ive seen the bid jump from low to mid .003s to .0041 and .0042 +25%~ within the last couple of weeks. Shouldnt that scream more demand than supply? That jump in bid support was on normal day to day buys and sells without any "pump" news, and any promotions. Did you ever think that maybe the 0 dilution within the last 3-4 months (not including the settlement for GL) has something to do with it as well? How about CSTI, which Im willing to bet my life on that its green leaves, and their selling behavior? Not the typical selling of a funder is it? If you havnt caught on by now, people that want in, are willing to pay more and the seller wants to sell for higher on each day that passes.
icon url

chloebware

01/14/12 4:10 AM

#69094 RE: NioStar #69085

I disagree......we beat the estimates!