Replies to post #6073 on Dime Bancorp Inc (fka DIMEQ)

[philipmax]

fbrutus and others, listen up. If the stipulation is signed, it's curtains for our claim. This was a check-mate move. If you read the APOR7 carefully it closes the books on the ltws with the settlement stipulation. What they offer is 10% of what is our minimal claim. Our claim is very strong, so much so, that the BK Court wasted and entire year listening to our plea. But, we lost, and there are remedies. Unfortunately, Art Steinberg left the room with his bag of goodies and we have no one to continue the battle.

OK, let's look at the possibilities:

Jones Day is in Judge Block's Court fighting the FDIC and DOJ. They have not been paid for 12 years of really, really good work. Would they be willing to take on the battle? They may not. They may have a conflict of interest with our adversaries.

We have to stop Judge Walrath from making this Amended POR FINAL, as we now know that she is with Rosen.

I am not a lawyer, but I know who sand-bagged me. I will not rest until real justice prevails.

[linda1]

We could file a Motion to intervene in the Anchor Litigation Proceedings and state in the Motion that the Dimeq LTW Holders are the real party in interest to 85 % net of the Anchor Award.


The down side is - then the Defendant and Plaintiff could cite the Opinion of Judge Walrath - which states we have no Claim against the Anchor Litigation Award and are Equity Interests of WMI.