ergo sum....
He can try to avoid calling the supposed results of evolution "higher" but it is sheer rationalization in order to avoid the obvious pitfall of his theory.
When I was a pre-med student in college, I took the usual courses - zoology, anatomy, genetics, embryology, and organic chemistry. At the time, I was an agnostic verging on atheist, and loved to criticize Christians and Christianity and knew all the arguments. Even then, though, I could not bring myself to believe in evolution - it was far too illogical and full of holes with zero real proof to support it. It took more faith to believe in evolution than it did to believe in God, although at the time I chose to believe in neither. It is interesting to note that some scientists who are among leading proponents of evolution freely admit the same thing, but since denying evolution leads eventually to admitting that there has to be a God, they choose to cling to their "faith" in evolution, which demands nothing of them.
mlsoft
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
