News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Sharktnk

01/10/12 11:44 AM

#36466 RE: varok #36465

Interesting.

I believe shortly after the R/S, the company will initiate a forward split in the range of about 200 for 1, which in turn, will lower the share price from $5 to .025 range and still maintain a market cap of $1,000,000 and a new O/S of 40,000,000 million.



From my limited experience it seems this is usually done simultaneously, that is, the verbiage goes something like ' A R\S of ______ immediately followed by a F\S of ______'


This is my theory, so let's continue on with the discussion and other creative ideas other than the usual ' business of past same ol same ol ' but with a hopeful positive future, that I feel the company, regardless of the current lose to holding shareholders, is the start of a new beginning.



If this means a future towards current bag-holders interests, sure. Otherwise, regardless seems to 'dis'-'regard' them a bit too flippantly ... Perhaps I am misunderstanding though.

icon url

billd43

01/10/12 11:59 AM

#36468 RE: varok #36465

I agree varok, but after a reorganization the company will need to offer other types of games that interest true gamers as well as providing the Christian games for the younger population, thereby giving parents and others a chose of the type of games that would want to purchase.
icon url

flaflyersfan

01/12/12 9:54 AM

#36485 RE: varok #36465

varok, no chance. LFBGD will dump 9,999,800,000 shares as fast as the market will allow.

Good luck.
icon url

Scott12

01/12/12 11:53 AM

#36488 RE: varok #36465

re:"I believe shortly after the R/S, the company will initiate a forward split in the range of about 200 for 1, which in turn, will lower the share price from $5 to .025 range and still maintain a market cap of $1,000,000 and a new O/S of 40,000,000 million."

I'm sure there is a fee involved with enacting a split. Why go through all of the trouble of having two splits, not to mention all of the confusion from shareholders, when one split with a ratio of 2500:1 would accomplish the same thing?