News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Justice37

01/08/12 10:10 PM

#154819 RE: bar1080 #154818

Just to clarify, I saw a few thousand tapes with labels from NASA and MIT, the tapes were very old and were in fact computer tapes. The only way I could verify it would be to run the tapes on machines that only exist with JBI, which is the reason whey MIT and NASA sent the tapes to JBI in the first place. I also took the word of someone who works at MIT, should I have fingerprinted him for confirmation?

icon url

fourkids_9pets

01/08/12 10:11 PM

#154820 RE: bar1080 #154818

really then where is their (sec)
input re: kidd and domark

it's conspicuous by its absence

stunningly so ..

anyhow contact marty .. he's across
the river (from MIT in cambridge)
in the sec boston office .. phone no.
is on the pdf (last page) and disregard
marty's vm re: laura .. you'll get to speak
with josh (after leaving a msg) .. who as of
thursday was taking calls specific to JBI

maybe he had time to actually read the *poorly*
written complaint this weekend .. and then again
maybe not ..

edit>> for your reading pleasure :)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=70449213&txt2find=domark

ho hum

==
4kids
all jmo

icon url

bar1080

01/08/12 10:19 PM

#154825 RE: bar1080 #154818

BTW, I'm a fan of really atrocious accounting... something that's become fairly rare in recent years, partially thanks to the PCAOB and the SEC's focus on smacking bad CPAs hard.

Should be fun to follow JBII again. Also wonder how far the disgorgement might extend. LOL

Bye