Replies to post #6349 on Raystream Inc.(fka RAYS)

[honeybadger]

You have it backwards. I was negative on the company *first* and then began to short sell its stock.

Whatever I post on this message board isn't going to change what the stock does -- chances are, most of the people buying and selling the stock aren't reading this.

I don't know why I even argue with people on this board about how lousy this company is - it doesn't get me anything, and probably half the people here are part of the pump & dump scam anyway.

Glad to see a few other people here, though, who are waiting for this pump to crash.

[baomike]

""SEC would've been on them. If you can show me where that happened ""

You must be counting on a lot of newbies (or at least people not familiar with he SEC). That's right in there with "look at all the short sales reported by FINRA".

This tells me you have never looked at the SEC sight :
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases.shtml

or the timeline illustrated by the SEC postings was somehow forgotten?

[baomike]

""And if indeed the company that pumped LEXG was guilty of a pump and dump scam Finra and the SEC would've been on them. ""

And how do you know they are not?
That was the point of the post. We do not know if the SEC is investigating.
If in a year or two a complaint is filed than YES, if no filing, then NO.
The point that seemingly was missed ; The SEC is slow.

The fact that nothing has appeared from the SEC means that nothing has appeared from the SEC.