So I hear, exuse me I mean "here" that some people are upset at others for their conjecture...LOL ..
Yet as you point out here:
DP could have said NO because the license details chang(ed), but I think they would still want to burn the grass just to see how it responded in the boiler. Of course an update about the LIVE TRIAL could have been the simplest way of telling us what happened. The MOU had a ONE YEAR TERM. They could have done the LIVE TRIAL later, but apparently did not.
Dr.K had a choice not to update Shareholders on that deal and plus many more and leave it to shareholders to find out for themselves what has happened to their money.
Dr.K supposedly left it to Dr.J to tell only select shareholders what happened so the could spread the word..LOL
So really who is to blame?
Some of these guys think Dr.K's farrrrrts don't stink even though their leading edge is facing the wind.
I may not be able to spellcheck but at least my teeth are clean...LOL