Nobody by no means is asking anyone to take a loss by selling here! Does anyone think they are helping the pps by perceiving everything is false because they do not see proof that meets their approval and then berates the CEO and the company by calling it a scam because a deal hasn't been made to date.
I mean come on, this is an issue that does need addressing and when a few of us tried approaching it in a logical manner to get answers, few were willing to go that route. Does anyone think that a message board is the correct format to address issues with a CEO? Does anyone think that threats and made up allegations about the company is going to resolve anything?
Sure we all want answers, but if those answers do not come within the time some want, then should it mean that the company is stalling or hiding something? Like I said and others agree that this is how it is here in pinkyland!
BTW - Did you ever consider that folks associated with the racetrack could have made statements that they shouldn't have and led Mr. Swank to believe that in fact that the letter of acceptance meant it was just a matter of time before the final formalities were put in place to ok the lease deal to Mr. Swank? It could just possibly been a very bad miss-communication, where one person thought this while another thought that.
I agree that this is a big learning curve for Mr. Swank, just as the fights were and mistakes were made and recently admitted to. Is this what we wanted? Heck no, but it is what it is and it needs to be dealt with the best way possible and just because he doesn't do it the way you suggest, doesn't make it completely wrong.
There always two sides to every coin and in time we will get to the bottom of it and hopefully things can be salvaged here very soon.If one thinks differently, then one has to make a decision based on their investing strategy and what they choose to believe. It's not that complicated imo.
Cheers!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
