Replies to post #37220 on BioStem Technologies Inc. (BSEM)

[crookedneck]

Really? If what you say is correct, which I can't verify, why are we suppose to take your word that what you say is stated as fact? If what we all want is documented proof, then it would apply to all, be it those who are for or against.

I do however support the need for documented proof on anything related with CGAQ. Just seems that it show flow both ways and just because someone was a former IR for CGAQ, does not make what he post as fact, which has been proven here in several cases. It also shows that tons of statements are made continuously here regarding CGAQ, be it for or against that can not be substantiated with real proof. Thus making most what is posted here as hearsay or opinion only. Especially when one uses such sources as a stable worker at the track. I mean come on, Really?

Not saying what you posted is incorrect, but what I am saying is that almost everything posted on this board is opinion only. This is a pink sheet stock where anything goes, including the risk associated with it. We will not know for sure of anything until it is supported with verifiable factual information. Until then it is a crap shoot and in the end we will see how it plays out.

Cheers! (Below is your quote)

First of all we are talking about a PUBLIC BIDDING. Second
they have no idea they are not speaking to a citizen. Third
I am fortunate in that I know people in the D.R. that can and
have put me in a three way conversation with the proper parties.