"Barring a contrary explanation, I think I would agree with him and I think if I were the trier of the fact, I would consider that out of the range of advocacy and more in the range of deception."
Now you are saying,
"You are twisting my words. I don't "agree" with Keith"
Are you really worth responding to?
edit: I think I was clear in stating that you helped clear up the confusion but you are confused in what my point was.