News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DewDiligence

11/16/11 7:57 PM

#131252 RE: DewDiligence #131156

Speaking of dumb sell-side analysts…get a load of this:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/16/drugs-eliquis-idUSN1E7AF1TU20111116

Atlantic Equities analyst Richard Purkiss said…a [priority] review might elevate Eliquis in the minds of some cardiologists.

Picture a cardiologist trying to decide which anticoagulant to prescribe for a given patient and ultimately making the decision based on which drug received an FDA priority review. Yes, it makes perfect sense, LOL.
icon url

DewDiligence

06/15/12 7:00 PM

#143967 RE: DewDiligence #131156

Cardiologists remain cautious about new oral anticoagulants:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/14/us-drugs-bloodthinners-idUSBRE85D06G20120614

warfarin is holding its own, with 33 million [!] U.S. prescriptions filled for atrial fibrillation and other uses last year, according to IMS Health, a healthcare information and services company. Some 2.2 million prescriptions were filled for Pradaxa.

About 130,000 U.S. prescriptions were written for Xarelto in the first three months of 2012. Pradaxa and Xarelto each cost about $3,000 a year, versus just $200 for generic warfarin.


Prominent U.S. heart doctors stress that neither new drug has a known antidote for a bleeding emergency, as warfarin does [but Portola is trying to change that—#msg-76672265]. They also say that patients using them should undergo testing ahead of time to ensure good kidney function…