From the big picture play perspective for Shining Tree, the consensus seems it is that "the big one" for the area will be similar in disposition to "the big ones" they've found in the comparable regional camps... with larger finds associated with deeper targets on structures formed along the fault boundaries.
So, what they'll be expected to be looking at to find "the big one" will be deeper targets associated with the footwalls along the base of the structure that is associated with the fault boundaries ?
Assuming that the picture described as the consensus is correct... it simply is the case that there hasn't been much of an effort made, yet, to look for those sorts of structurally defined targets.
If they're drilling along the fault boundaries down at 400 to 600 meters, that's probably what they're doing...
If, instead, they're drilling a larger number of shallower holes in a grid pattern... they're trying to define something in the distribution of a shallower resource...
Still a division possible, at shallow depths, between the low grade ores in "zones" and the higher grade ores in quartz veins... and the consensus opinion doesn't actually constrain what did happen in creating the distribution in the rocks that does exist... so, who knows, they could get lucky and find a large but lower grade ore body closer to the surface than expected... and it could even be paired with higher grades in quartz stockwork, just to sweeten the pot.
The news you'd see, if that were true, would still tend to enable them in being "stealthy"... the reports of higher grades would still be narrow intersections, and the lower grade results that matter more, would appear more or less boring... since most people just don't pay all that much attention to reports of smaller intersections reporting lower grade results...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
