To get there, of course, you have to do the work...
That will mean pairing the "knowns" you have in hand, and the big picture in the physical geology with that you get from the geophysics... to define the targets you want to test...
And then you still need to get lucky with a couple of holes that hit what you want them to hit... not just in terms of placement relative to structure, but in terms of the holes showing that the structures actually have in them what you'd like them to have...
Thus far, SRSR has been pretty tight lipped about what they have.
It's fairly obvious that they're going to remain tight lipped, too, at least until the next round of exploration activity, and perhaps until the next 43-101 report, where we might see something of a new picture, indicating a change resulting from exploration relative to the "baseline" report they've issued ?
Results get reported... but, they report singular snapshots of particular aspects... and what you need to see is the aggregate of all the snapshots, properly correlated...
Show me 53 grams per ton on the surface, paired with gravity and IP surveys, along with a couple of holes that reveal both the structures of interest, and what they have in them as far as similar values in larger quantities than a single sample ?
They're drilling, now, at Shining Tree... but, we haven't a clue what it is they're actually going to be looking at ?
Still, IF they find it... we're going to find out...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
