RE: At some point owning the majority of the float reaches a critical mass to where it actually becomes a detriment to one's holdings. If one owns most of something but no one else wants any of it then how much is it really worth? Zip! <--well that's the accumulation strategy that occurred. This had 2 solutions: majority ownership & appreciation following a business being inserted into the shell. Many of these SCG guys knew that they'd be holding long term & were willing to tie it up. Zippo value? yes, throughout the duration of the empty shell.
RE: I want my due credit there, lol, whatever. It was probably so easy for the SEC <---There, there, now, lol. :) I genuinely laughed with you there. You may deserve credit, quite possible. Unfortunately we may never be privy to the reasons attached to the sec suspension. The claims? Yeah, I kinda, sorta & may just a little - agree with you! Maybe it was too soon, too public, outlandish? I don't know, personally. Who had the right to say what & at the end will the claims be true? I truly believe they will, but we have to wait. IMO, I believe it was the presence of the tainted players who were already in boiling water with the sec that, by minimum, 'added salt to the wound.' By hey, could it really be all or most a Medlink route? Yeah, sure can. No one can say this it was definitely not!
Re: Your shares? Well I don't know what to say there other than grey is known to be a moving target. The fact that consistency has been present between .01 & .02 leads me to believe that your broker is just putting the greys at the bottom of the priority list (more so than typical). There's been trades, even some days with 100k-300k. Someone's buying ... someone's selling. Your .05? well that is obviously not before the stock broke the .05 mark otherwise it would have never gotten to .053. There wasn't a ton of volume above .05, but you'd have filled .05 before it went to .053 (if you were in there selling before that break).
Market Data 
Markets 
