News Focus
News Focus
icon url

GEO928

11/07/11 4:13 PM

#34217 RE: StephanieVanbryce #34214

Steph....are you joking once again....??

that crap was published in 2003 and endorsed by 8000 doctors....

unfortunately, there are over 350,000 doctors in the US.....

ps: that 8k is about 2%....ever hear of a bell curve distribution.....that's not far from the amount of "crazies" at either end of the curve....

try and be serious.....

do you really believe MOST doctors want the government to TELL them how much they can make.....and, give them protocols for testing & diagnosis ????

really, Steph....

(ok....there's the window....c'mon, progressives....tell us how wonderful it will be to be a ward of the state and have doctors waste 8 years of their lives to have their salaries capped by bureaucrats!!!....hahaha!!!)

universal health care must must be rammed down the throats of a public who does not want it....

icon url

fuagf

11/07/11 4:18 PM

#34219 RE: StephanieVanbryce #34214

Our Mission: Single-Payer National Health Insurance


Greg Silver, MD

The U.S. spends twice as much as other industrialized nations on health care, $8,160 per capita. Yet our system performs
poorly in comparison and still leaves 50 million without health coverage and millions more inadequately covered.

This is because private insurance bureaucracy and paperwork consume one-third (31 percent) of
every health care dollar. Streamlining payment through a single nonprofit payer would save more
than $400 billion per year, enough to provide comprehensive, high-quality coverage for all Americans.

Click here to learn more about single-payer national health insurance ..
http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-resources

One of your links .. http://www.pnhp.org/ .. did for now .. just felt
like putting that out in the fresh air .. off shopping for more now ..
icon url

shermann7

11/07/11 5:38 PM

#34237 RE: StephanieVanbryce #34214

Nice Site!!!

"Why is the U. S. so different? The short answer is that we alone treat health care as a commodity distributed according to the ability to pay, rather than as a social service to be distributed according to medical need. In our market-driven system, investor-owned firms compete not so much by increasing quality or lowering costs, but by avoiding unprofitable patients and shifting costs back to patients or to other payers. This creates the paradox of a health care system based on avoiding the sick. It generates huge administrative costs, which, along with profits, divert resources from clinical care to the demands of business. In addition, burgeoning satellite businesses, such as consulting firms and marketing companies, consume an increasing fraction of the health care dollar."

Shermann