an article from the daily communist (daily kos) has zero credibility...
Naturally you didn't read the embedded links within the diary that rips your theory to sheds.
Over four-fifths of physicians now agree that either fundamental changes are needed in our health care system, or that it needs completely rebuilt.
On April 27th, forty-four national physician organizations wrote to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to outline their common goals and strategies "for improving health care delivery and making affordable, high-quality care available to all Americans." The co-signatories included the largest groups representing America’s family physicians, internists, obstetricians and gynecologists, and surgeons. http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/where_we_stand/access/healthcarereform.pdf
The letter’s sentiments mirror the results of a national survey of physicians published in January by the Journal of General Internal Medicine, which found that only a small fraction of U.S. physicians supported leaving the U.S. health care financing system as it is. Nearly half favored either tax incentives or penalties to encourage the purchase of medical insurance, and four in ten preferred a government-run, single-payor, taxpayer-financed national health insurance program. http://www.springerlink.com/content/g6m4153528pq2712/fulltext.html
Just six years ago, similar polling found only 1 in 4 physicians supporting a single-payor system.
These findings challenge the public perception that American doctors are by and large unsympathetic to growing call for an overhaul of our costly and deeply unequal current health care system. Nine in ten physicians in fact agreed that every American should receive needed medical care regardless of ability to pay. Physician attitudes have undergone a marked turnabout in the last four decades.
The American College of Physicians, a national association representing 124,000 internists and internal medicine subspecialists, has been the medical organization perhaps most vocal in support of universal health care coverage. The ACP takes the position that "health insurance coverage and benefits should be continuous and not dependent on place of residence or employment status." http://www.acponline.org/
In December 2007, the organization became the first and thus far only medical association to endorse a single-payor national health insurance system as a viable option to achieve universal health care. The only alternative option the ACP recommends is a private/public model, much like what the Obama administration proposes. The ACP warns, however, that this health care model will likely result in inequities in coverage, and higher costs when compared to a single-payor system.
Every other national primary care organization likewise strongly favors universal health care coverage. The American Academy of Family Physicians, http://www.aafp.org/ a national association representing 94,000 family doctors, crafted a health care reform proposal in 2001 which advocates for "a national health system with a basic set of benefits offered to all individuals."
The American Academy of Pediatrics, http://www.aap.org/ representing over 60,000 pediatricians nationwide, endorses the idea that "quality health insurance should be a right, regardless of income, for every child, pregnant woman, their families, and ultimately all individuals." Nine in ten pediatricians recently surveyed said they wanted a health insurance program that would cover all children in this country.
And the American Academy of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, http://www.acog.org/ a national association representing 52,000 obstetricians and gynecologists, has issued a national health care reform agenda entitled "Health Care For Women, Health Care For All", http://www.acog.org/departments/govtrel/HCFWHCFA-ReformPrinciples.pdf which "call[s] on Congress and the States to cover all people in the U.S."
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
