Amphastar's attorney was basing his one year to prepare timeline on the difficulty of the discovery process. An indicator that Amphastar intends to stonewall discovery as much as possible, perhaps?
I'm being facetious. This is the sort of inferential stuff that tends to get us in trouble (remember the inferences about Amphastar having no chance for approval?), and I'm not going to put much weight on yours or Clark's or mine in this instance.
a) Should Momenta fire their lawyer for being so incompetent as to keep very confidently answering 1 month even when the judge tried to get him to up his number.
b) Why was it beneficial for the Amphastar lawyer to flat out acknowledge his case was very difficult as a way of making excuses for how long it would take - and along the way look as full of lame excuses as my kids were when they were 3 years old.
c) Is there legal precedent for claiming damages when you yourself controlled the amount of damages that would be inflicted on yourself.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
