"It's always someone else's fault and it's starting to wear thin."
That I agree with. Turrini is the CEO... yet claims he is never responsible for anything. That pattern is overly well established as fact.
That argument about who is responsible doesn't work. Clearly. By definition.
Who is responsible... is defined by who has what job.
The obvious, of course, is that it is the OFFICERS of the company who are responsible for the "doing"...
Turrini as CEO, and Peirce as the former CFO...
And yet, what we see in their filings is the wildly fatuous claim that it is the board members who are supposed to be doing the officers' jobs for them ?
The OFFICERS are posturing that the board members should resign because they're both
1. being prevented from doing their jobs as directors by management's obstructions... ?
and
2. not doing the managements jobs for them ?
You'd have to be insane to not recognize how stupid that is.
Including, now, that we need some splainin done... on why it is that the company's management and lawyers appear to be suing the company, on behalf of the company, in California.
That is truly about the stupidest thing I've ever seen.
Clearly that isn't going to work, either... because it can't... and I can't see anyone else who CAN BE responsible for that, either... other than those who appear to have already perjured themselves in the court filings we can see?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
