Replies to post #154498 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[jaxstraw]

I agree.
That would be the biggest issue.
Deletions and restores are cut and dry. Either you violated the TOU or you did not.
Trying to force feed a team effort on an already adversarial viewpoint is really a stretch.
My feeling would be like Solomon.
Get rid of the sticks entirely and keep the IBOX.
Eliminate the potential battleground to one place.

[IH Admin [Shelly]]

"Board mod teams are generally either pro or con a stock, and that obviously taints boards. That said, I'd suggest maybe requiring at least one "dissenting" mod on each board. i.e. no deck stacking."

I think we're hopeful that this will be naturally occurring. Anyone can apply.

We can't set up specific slots for specific investment sentiment. We would be judging their value as a Mod on whether they were positive, neutral or negative re: the stock and that's not something we can do. The judgment is whether they can abide by and enforce the rules.

"Without someone ultimately responsible for a board, I predict that the iBox and stickeys will become a warzone having to be settled in the principal's office daily."

Yeah, I imagine there will be a lot of that at the beginning. But, no matter how much ppl complain to us, we're not going to get involved in these disputes daily. People are going to have to step up and act like adults. When there's disagreement in the workplace, people don't go running to their boss every 15 minutes. They deal with it - they compromise, they choose their battles. Same kind of thing here.