News Focus
News Focus
icon url

phoenix69

06/28/05 9:42 PM

#24218 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

Most Excellent Perspective, JP!!!!!!!!EOM
icon url

StatenIsd

06/28/05 9:48 PM

#24219 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

ACTS 4:12..Seems to disagree with your analogy
icon url

Cabernet

06/28/05 10:10 PM

#24222 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

Ummmm...I guess if someone else other than JP typed this they would have been told to keep their religious beliefs off the board... but because it's put up by the moderator no one is allowed to say anything. I guess this means religion and politics are ok on the NEOM board??????????? I think not...
icon url

tonyere

06/28/05 10:17 PM

#24226 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

I can't think of one post on this board that i disagree with more.
icon url

moxa1

06/28/05 10:34 PM

#24231 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

OT JP - It's called chi or ki by oriental people... not only do we interact with it... we ARE it. Imbalances do occur... which causes one to lose their way (physically, psychologically, or spiritually) but this is correctable until it becomes irreparable... from dust to dust.


icon url

Tonguehair

06/28/05 11:18 PM

#24241 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

You're good at neom stuff. Please share all the neom stuff you got. Multi-versed expositions on "The Meaning of life" and "My idea of God" are probably not well-suited to a board whose primary purpose is to concern itself with a very narrow focus on a particular stock. At best, it will only offend a few. Maybe we could talk about immigration policy/abortion/multi-ratial marriages or social tax theory instead.
icon url

stock_raving_mad

06/29/05 1:19 AM

#24247 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

OT: JP, this must be the NEOM gospel hour. OK, with relation to what you wrote, check this out.


John 8.58. "I tell you the truth," Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am!"

John 1

1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2. He was with God in the beginning.
3. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.
4. In him was life, and that life was the light of men.
5. The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it.

John 8.12. When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."

Mark14.61. But Jesus remained silent and gave no answer. Again the high priest asked him, "Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?"
62. "I am," said Jesus.

John 14.6. Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

Acts 4.12. Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.

icon url

Pimpdastox

06/29/05 4:01 AM

#24258 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

JP..my friend i see the same light, and i see what your intentions were with that post, your intention was wonderful. In life, people can't see past the now and present,currently everyone is so pre-occupied with making material gain on a stock, having said that, so am I, however, heed one thing folks, we are fortunate in this lifetime to be here in this abundance. WE must find it in ourselves to help the needy, poor, hungry, and the much less fortunate, if we dont then in the next lifetime will be the ones less fortunate. BTW, the way you people reacted at JP post is utterly shameful, this is the guy that has done more for this board, since Retired and Playing then anyone, has answered everyone querries about NEOM, solved many mysteries albeit with Success's help and many of you great longs. Has put thankless hours of his own time, all for our benefits, and this is how you treat him...tsk tsk, dudes give your head a shake. In a lighter note, Zacked i have to agree with you, there was no mention of Paperclick in JP's post, that to me according to the Bashers handbook, makes JP and outright hideous Basher!! hahaha.
JP, hang in there buddy, your always appreciated by me, always!

icon url

Tonguehair

12/12/06 2:22 PM

#103442 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

What are people thinking is the revenue associated with this incredible news? I sure hope it's alot because, neom could sure use some cash around now, (see post #24215)don't you think? Does anybody think they will make reference to the $$ amount or how exactly they'll be making cash revenue once they release the PR on their own?

I'm wondering if the market is already factoring in those additional 750 million shares being registered under the S-3 filing. If so, I think the calculation would be something like (see post #24215) 1.2billion x .07 = $84 million. The company really might be undervalued if neom is worth more than that.

If the company is really worth, like $200million, then the price should be approx. $0.166. Does anyone think it will ever go that high?

TIA
icon url

blackydog

12/13/06 11:48 AM

#103725 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

Therefore be in the light anb back up the truck!
icon url

Tonguehair

12/15/06 12:35 PM

#104160 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

It looks like the price is lower now than it was before the big PR about the soccer clips in that popular UK newspaper (partly owned by a huge news conglomerate). Why do you think???

If that newspaper has great success with people viewing the soccer clips, it will most definitely be inclined to expand quode usage to other revenue-driving functions. And if that proves successful, there will most likely be others in the parent corp. family that will take a sniff.

Neom's big problem though is that it needs $$, like, yesterday to avoid a terrific meltdown (between $17mil and $22mil, approx). I suppose we can assume that there's little to no revenue associated with the soccer clips (they would have let us know, don't you think?). And time is of the essence!!! It just seems like the market doesn't trust this company or this stock any more.

To be sure, Cornell is now in the driver's seat and the only thing they are interested is a return on their investment. Unfortunately, their end game has to do with trading the paper. That's where all the regular investors get hurt. Remember the old addage: "If you don't know who the Patsy is (in the game, on the board, etc), you're it!".
icon url

Tonguehair

12/22/06 2:28 PM

#105102 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

JP, I disagree because there is nothing in our experience that would lead us to believe that this company/this management will be successful. I think that, all we can really go by is our experience. I don't know if I would be overstating it to say that probably 95% + of the folks on this board have lost money (some, a whole lot), even if only on paper so far.

The 5 billion authorized shares should have been a wake up call to everybody (I guess it kind of was; the stock has steadily tanked since then). I think the only way these kind of penny companies keep the game rolling is through the hype perpetrated on boards like this (we have to face it: nobody in the "legit" investment world pays attention to these little shenanigan-filled paper monsters....)

No, experience contradicts your assertion that neom will do something it has never done in the past: be competent/make money. But surely you must know that already? If not, I would just say, let history be your guide. Who would've thought there would still be folks talking about the "glory days a comin'" even as the price has plunged to the nickel range? It's sad that so many people (and the families they're associated with) have lost so very much money in the failed neom story.

icon url

Tonguehair

12/22/06 3:03 PM

#105106 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

JP, your words:

"I emphatically believe we will be refinanced, be rid of Cornell with cash in hand from sale of our holdings and generating revenue with new and existing customers of qode."

Again, you write: "I emphatically believe".

Please, don't take offence, but you have probably written of your strong "beliefs" hundreds (if not thousands) of times over the past years on this board, would you not agree? Does it suffice to say that neither you (nor certainly, anybody here on this board whose only experience is the loss of cash), should place any stock at all in what you personally believe? It goes back to my previous post: What in your and our experience as it relates to your "belief" argues for a vote of confidence? To the contrary, I am quite certain a highly significant correllation could be shown, indicating an inverse relationship between your "belief" and what actually happens.

Does this sound personally offensive? I really hope not. It's just that, again, it makes good sense for people to seek out the folks who have a history of success and follow their lead. By the same token, it makes very good sense to identify those who have been partially responsible for false hopes and decreased wealth and to stand very clear of them and their "beliefs".




icon url

Tonguehair

12/28/06 1:16 PM

#105458 RE: Rotten Johnny #24215

T'would be too naive indeed to see this nickel price as a bottom (and dangerous as well for those who forgo salvaging what does at least remain).

With neom's hundreds and hundreds of millions of shares, it is a prime candidate for those sub-penny prices and consistent 20-50 million days where Cornell consistently picks up several thousand $$, chipping away at the pound of flesh it has demanded in return for its easy cash to the greedy incompentents that are neom management.