Replies to post #55987 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[Susie924]

If that was the case then the problem would be on all sites. I have only had the problems with IHUB and SI.

[BullNBear52]

Maybe posters should check their own internet providers before criticizing iHub's servers.

I'm not criticizing IHub's servers. Both Matt and Bob went through their own little nightmare bringing them up to speed and capacity. And I may have been a little critical of that playing Monday morning QB in the planning and implementation.

As grubmaster noted earlier someone (at the ISP) #msg-6789259

The issue lies in the communication process of changes made by the ISP. The ISP should be informing IHUB of impending changes and IHUB should be informing their customers of potential downtime when those changes are about to take effect.

As grubmaster pointed out...

Posted by: grubmaster
In reply to: Old_Drummerman who wrote msg# 55813 Date:6/24/2005 10:33:40 PM
Post #of 56009

That would appear to be a DNS problem somewhere upstream from us.

We switched back to the temporary IP addresses Monday since they were performing better. It's possible that James is back and they are continuing with their network reorganization. I'm sure y'all we be the last to know... right after us. :-)