It all makes sense to me now. I thought that the people with tens of millions of shares would have motive to help the stock price achieve PERMANENT growth, but really it makes a lot more sense for them to pump and dump. I own 2.8 million shares and I make about $281 for every point that UNIVEC goes up. If people like Ribotsky and Dalton own many TIMES as many shares as I do, then they probably make AT LEAST thousands of dollars for every point that Univec goes up. I figured that it would be in their interest to have the stock price get permanent growth, but in hindsight I should have realized that it's easier and safer for them to just manipulate the stock price to get a few points higher, then sell high and make the stock price go back down again. People who own 60 million shares don't want the stock to achieve permanent growh, they just want to keep pumping and dumping the stock.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
