you can try and rationalize it any way you can... FACT is, Bush has rolled back 30 years of environmental protection laws in favor of corporate interests
I am truly interested in this ! Could you please follow up ?
" And, of course, Bush have given extremely generous tax breaks to people who use technology which is good for the environment. But, you'll never mention that. "
Then, we will be able to compare the 'generous tax breaks he has given to the polluting companies' versus the 'non polluting companies .
>>>So, by promoting technology with gov't resources, Bush has actually improved gov't policy.<<<
Bush propaganda at its best and you swallowed it whole. What good is promoting technology if you discourage the use of it?
"The Bush plan delays deadlines for meeting these public health standards, allowing violations of soot and smog health standards to continue until 2015 or later. The Bush plan allows more than twice as much S02 for nearly a decade longer (2010 - 2018), than the Clean Air Act currently allows. The plan also allows more than one and a half times as much NOx for nearly a decade longer (2010-2018."
"While the president's air pollution bill (S.131) has been promoted as a power plant bill, the new analyses, conducted by the Clean Air Task Force and Environmental Defense, document how the bill eliminates and weakens a variety of Clean Air Act requirements for most industries."
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
