Any opinions on this that you would be willing to share?
well as you've seen in the last hour, I have lots to say! lol. I am just awaiting the credit deserved to Ken Ash for actually revealing the name of the attorney that management has retained. I sincerely believe that the clarity provided, in that respect, owes Mr. Ash many apologies. I'd enjoy writing some sample apologies for those who owe it to KA & I may very well do that. On another note, I also believe that the transparency of potential existing business, with Premiere, should be at a more credible level too. I cannot logically see a reason for such an attorney to entertain anwm management with no business & no intent to do business. Obviously the events, that will take place, are being prioritized & we ALL are required to defer to the legal representative(s) with respect to that order. Business news with the stock in grey turmoil is obviously not in the best interest of the company & shareholders. If they want to clean up by at least submitting to finra 1st, then so be it. That 'call" (in order of events) is up to management & lawyer & not shareholders or the critical 'SEC GURUS!'
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
