Thank you for posting that piece.
The media's choice, Romney, is very similar to Bloomberg, and flops around more than a fish out of water. Like Jello, he simply takes on the form of whatever surrounds him at the moment.
Perry, for all the hype, proved to be a 'roman candle' .. eight or ten big, colorful blasts, then nothing left but a smoldering stub in the ground, with the deer in the headlights personna.
Michelle Bachman was a flash in the pan .... now, nothing.
Santorum's fuse never was lit.
Huntsman ... who?
Cain is the only true republican candidate among the field. He is growing daily, and the media is being forced to give him some attention. Hopefully, it will only grow, and he will get to shine as the brightest one of the bunch .. which he is.
Newt is intelligent and shrewd, but slick as snot. He could balance out a ticket as VP for Cain, though, with his 'insider' savvy.
Ron Paul is just the same ol' Ron Paul he has always been. He's still trying to sell the same bill of goods he was peddling the last two times he tried to run. It resonates better now, in the present political climate and economical situation, but still, IMO, isn't the solution. I don't doubt his sincerity, it's just the things he is sincere about that bother me.
I'm still a 100% Cain supporter, and believer. The man has a better grasp on the big picture than anyone on either side of the aisle, and the balls to stand up and speak his piece - damn the torpedos, full speed ahead.
Cain in 2012 .... Cain / Gingrich would rule, but will Newt ever settle for second fiddle? Or more accurately, would his high maintenance mate ever settle for second fiddle?
Cain has to take the lead position, though. He could carry the ticket straight to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.