Excellent post, thanks for laying it all out, hispeed. Holding tight here and picking up at these bargain prices. Soon the cork will be pulled and the champagne flows.
The lawyers only allowed Sarissa to use the "MAY" language in the DC. If there is a share distribution, then it will be of HKHE shares. How could Sarissa use any other language when the transaction has not been approved?
I get it. I was a technical writer for the Air Force for four years and words like "will" and "shall" are binding. If they are 95% sure it will happen the 5% will dictate a "may".
That is an excellent summery of what we know is going on. I can verify most of what you say in your lost as I received the same responses. Now, I see two camps developing here. The yes votes and no votes obviously. It does not have to be that black and white yet. What if both sides just demanded some clear cut answers prior to the vote? I really do think if a simple Q and A with Scott could fix this to the point of everyone voting with a clear vision of what is going on. Maybe someone who has Scott's ear could help facilitate this? Round up some serious direct question here that we should be able to get answered with some valuable answers for all. Just an idea that could push us all into a Yes corner with confidence.
my cousin's the CEO of a FORTUNE 500 company and he refused to tell his shareholders the details of recent acquisitions - including the purchase prices! Scott has been much more transparent which is amazing for a Pink Sheet stock - IMO