Sept. 16th 2009 was the first time that your report was thrown directly into the trash can. It was also the first day of trading after the shareholder meeting where etc was *launched* and people were able to see what a crock that whole thing was so they dumped shares like they were going out of style because they knew nobody was going to buy the crapinets.
=== wrong on all counts
first of all there was no SM .. on sept 16th 2009 the *launch* of etc was pr'd at approx 11 am on 9/15/09 the *exit* by those who DO .. was done on 9/14/09
as i noted <once i realized who left the calling cards due to that *enlightening* call> .. nothing PR'd out of expo's mgmt ... er .. *short* of .. mgmt pr'ing ETC entering lowes <which anyone who actually has familiarity with running a business and capital outlay req'd knew wasn't gonna be pr'd that day> was NOT gonna change the outcome
ALREADY SET IN MOTION >>>
how ironic that volume avgs would be the key to what was done both in 2009 .. 2010 and now 2011 ..
with an OS/AS of 1 BILLION <2009> .. vs today's OS/AS of 3.33 BILLION
that is the crux of the dilemma ..
and why it does matter who holds what shares .. which certs have never been deposited .. and of course *who* wash traded exph in 2009 to maintain *volume* and .. er .. generate interest pre .. 9/15/09
fyi .. it's no longer just in the sec's purview with finra's interest ~ which i also noted in this very venue .. in *real time*
there is no doubt expo has serious issues .. but whether those who illegally manipulated exph's stock in 2009 <which to be clear imo is not mgmt> get away with it is yet to be determined ..
time will tell
done with this *topic* previously discussed a few 100x over
my interest .. continues to be what trades *show* .. which MM they come off of <size wise> reported and what exph's volume is
and of course what the date of expo's SM is ..
what others have an interest in ... is their business