Replies to post #100927 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[P2O I'm from MO]

including the broker who saw NITE
playing fast and loose who also filed a complaint
against NITE with the sec specific to *exph trades*

Well, at least the "broker" said he filed a complaint.
There is unlikely to be any proof offered of said complaint filed.

[underdog150]

Yes you are 4kids, because all you do is watch l2 with the belief that insiders and others are not selling. This fallacy has been proven in other stocks that insiders were indeed selling and yet you still base all your information on something that is highly unlikely in EXPH. Have you seen the forms 3 and 4 that insiders promised at the last all will be revealed SM?
--------------------
wrong

but we've had this discussion *previously*
underdog .. a few times over .. it is irrelevant
to me what is believed vs. what isn't .. i know
what complaints i've filed as well as others *here*
have as well .. including the broker who saw NITE
playing fast and loose who also filed a complaint
against NITE with the sec specific to *exph trades*

[Santa Barbara Broker]

Maybe if I even take it down another step. Why is it that you find it absolutely impossible that the most obvious, easiest to understand and most logical explaination for the manipulation of EXPH stock is the one explaination that has to be incorrect? That it simply couldn't have happened the way all other pink sheet and OTC manipulation has happened since it first began because it is far more likely in this one lone case, a couple dozen people put a multi-million dollar MM scheme in place to make around $100K on EXPH shares and lose around 95% of what they invested in setting it up. And that is proven somehow because of the trading volume being recorded for three years? I mean...REALLY? IMHO.