Replies to post #1169 on Anti-Globalist Forum

[Vexari]

Senate Report 93-549

War and Emergency Powers Acts,
Executive Orders and the New World Order
The civil war in regard to the de facto system

http://www.barefootsworld.net/war_ep.html



U.S. Law is Private Merchant Law

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=34111185



The Declaration of Martial Law

This Awareness indicates that when Lincoln was assassinated, no one thought to put an end to his declaration of martial law because of the civil War and because the martial law has continued up to this time, from the time of the Civil war, the nation can be directed by what is called Admiralty Law or martial law by simply command of the President or the authority of the land or his agents.

It is not even acquired by Admiralty law that Congress conduct proceedings to make laws. The Admiralty Law can provide statutes, which are called statutory laws, while the country is under Admiralty or martial law, but the Admiralty and martial law must come to an end and eventually, and this is the year (Revelations of Awareness Newsletter 94-14) in which it must either end or be reinstated.

Thus, within a short time, entities will find a new effort to create martial law in this country again. It may be martial law against what is termed a crime wave, even though crime has decreased two years in a row and has not increased much in the past several years. This Awareness indicates it still is considered to be a major concern by most entities, because crime is being advertised continuously on television and in the news media, to make entities feel that crime is ever on the march, ever on the increase.


http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/creator/nationaldebt.htm



Two Federalisms

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=2230176&txt2find=Admiralty



The Law is the Weapon

The Courtroom the Battlefield

The Judge is Your Enemy

Your Lawyer is an Enemy Spy..



No stare decisis

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=2953987&txt2find=Admiralty



The world is a dangerous place to live

not because of the people who are evil

but because of the people who don't do anything about it..


~ Albert Einstein ~


this is why i rarely just post a link

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=34111915&txt2find=Admiralty



An excellent site for further research

Constitution Society: http://constitution.org/c5/index.php

[IxCimi]

Constitutional law lies within framework of the older Common law.
They apply to flesh and blood human beings. There, the two main points are;

1.) Do no harm (injury) to another or his or her property, the law of torts.

2.) Do as you agree to do, as you agree to do it, the law of contracts.

Everything else is the operation of commerce in fiction. It does NOT apply to you, directly. But they have made it so it seems so. Unwittingly people assume the fictional idemsonan, the JAMOKE, rather then the jamoke is them. It is not. It's a legal fiction the banksters and legal world want you to accept, identify and interact with.

That IS the Matrix.

It's the difference between being shopper at Wal-Mart And a Wal-Mart employee. Who has to follow Wal-Mart corporate policy? The shopper? Or the employee?

Only the employee of course!

Shoppers are free to do as they please as long as the do no harm, and pay their bill (contract to an exchange of goods and services for currency). They are the tabacco chewin', tube top wearin' Sovereign public.

Employees MUST follow corporate regulations while at Wal-Mart. They gotta live up to the dress code and corporate policy. They are "U.S. citizens" of Wal-Mart. You are a state Citizen at best in reality. A shopper under no obligation.

Got it?

You NEVER want to enter a plea. A plea ACCEPTS the jurisdiction. In this way, only subject matter jurisdiction is then challengeable.

If they say this is a matter at law, my defense against this jurisdiction is whether or not there is a damaged party. (No charging instrument, no crime.) 

If they say this is a matter in hustings (which is the true nature of action of all administrative law), your defense against this jurisdiction is that you are not an artificial person (unless a federal citizen - but that is quite another matter entirely), unless they can show from the records in the Secretary of State's office that you have charted as such.

If they say this is an admiralty matter, your defense against this jurisdiction is whether the offense was committed on federal territory over which the state has retained concurrent jurisdiction (although one has to wonder how the state exercises an admiralty jurisdiction in light of 28 USC § 1333).

If they say this is a military matter, your defense against this jurisdiction is that,

1.) I am not a member of their military, 

And  2.) the nation is not under martial law (or is it?). 

And there you have it.