Iran’s exporting oil to China has the potential to wreck Bush’s plans for world domination. He is going to have to stop Iran.
In a world that runs on oil, the nation that controls the flow of oil has great strategic power. U.S. policy-makers want leverage over the economies of competitors -- Western Europe, Japan and China -- that are more dependent on Middle Eastern oil. #msg-4798276
I have included an additional text relating to crude content.
-Am
Iran exporting 60% of oil to eastern Asia
TEHRAN, June 17 (MNA) – Iran’s Minister of Oil Bijan Namdar Zanganeh told the Mehr News Agency that the country is presently exporting 60 percent of its oil products to the East Asian countries.
He further said, “With regard to the increasing consumption of the crude oil by the East Asian countries, particularly China, as well as increase of demand for the WTI light oil by the European countries, Iran has changed policies on oil export.”
Currently, 60 percent of the country’s oil is exported to the eastern Asia, and the rest is exported to the Mediterranean, northern Europe, and southern Africa, the minister said.
Commenting on the recent decision made by OPEC to increase the production, Zanganeh stated that the decision does not have any significant impact on the organization’s production, since OPEC members are using their full capacities for production.
Another report issued by the same agency some while age also quoted Hojjatollah Ghanimifard, deputy international affairs of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), as saying, “The European states have moved toward importing the crude oil without sulfur - the light oil - therefore, demands of these countries for the crude oil produced by the Persian Gulf states has decreased.”
According to him, the European countries are predicted to hold low shares of the heavy and sour crude oils in their energy stock by 2020.
“Thus, with regard to the current conditions, the oil suppliers such as Iran have to change the policies of their markets unless the European states embark on setting up refineries for refining the heavy crude oil”, he added.
Saudi Arabia bitter over global taste for sweet and not sour oil by Carl Mortished
Published on 11 Oct 2004 by Times Online. Archived on 11 Oct 2004.
SAUDI ARABIA’s oil minister said his country was ready to pump more oil but it could not find buyers as the Kingdom’s high-sulphur crude was being rejected by Western refineries.
In a bid to quell the surging price of crude, Ali al-Naimi said Saudi Arabia was ready to pump more crude but gave warning to consuming nations that they needed to invest in new refineries to process Saudi Arabia’s “sour” crude.
“We have 500,000 barrels a day extra capacity and we are ready to produce now but there are no buyers. Consumer nations need to build sufficiently sophisticated refineries to be able to handle sour crude,” said Mr Al-Naimi, speaking at an oil conference yesterday in the Gulf.
The Saudi minister’s comments highlight emerging problem of high-sulphur oil reserves. “There’s a difference between sour and sweet crude and what’s on offer now is the light sour crude,” Mr Al-Naimi said.
Tightening emission controls over motor vehicles have increased demand from refiners for low-sulphur (“sweet”) crudes, such as North Sea Brent or Nigeria’s Bonny Light, which are easily refined into high-quality petrol or ultra-low sulphur diesel fuel.
However, supplies from Nigeria are likely to be under threat today from a general strike in the troubled West African state where the main labour union is protesting high petrol prices.
A shortage of sweet crudes, such as Brent and America’s West Texas Intermediate, has driven their prices to extraordinary levels. On Friday, Brent set a new record closing just shy of $50 a barrel.
A chasm is growing between the premium price of sweet crudes and the discounted price at which the bulk of the world’s oil is sold. The surplus of sour crude is hitting the price of Arab Light, a higher-sulphur crude that accounts for most of the Saudi exports, and the Kingdom has been forced to double the discount at which it is priced against Brent.
Russian oil, too, is being shunned for its sulphur content. Urals, the main blend of Russian export crude is now trading at more than $7 below the price of US Light crude, compared with just $2 a year ago.
According to oil industry experts, about 40 per cent of the world’s current crude output is “sweet”, but rough estimates of the proven reserves in the ground show more than 75 per cent is higher-sulphur “sour” crude. A shortage of refineries capable of converting sour crude into low-emission fuels suggests continuing price pressure on sweet blends and high prices for consumers.
“The world is going sour,” said Rafiq Latta of Petroleum Argus, a publication that monitors crude prices. “The only regions where there is room for expanding sweet production is West Africa and Algeria.”
North Sea and Texas oilfields have been the largest, easily accessible sources of low-sulphur crude but these are now in accelerating decline. For future oil supply, the world will increasingly look to the sour crudes of the Gulf and Russia.
A lack of refineries equipped to process sour crudes is the problem, according to Julian Lee of the Centre for Global Energy Studies. “America hasn’t built a new refinery since 1976,” he said.
Ever-tightening environmental legislation is adding to the pressure on refiners to buy premium crudes, Mr Lee said. Even refiners equipped to convert sour crudes are now finding it necessary to buy lighter, sweeter products to produce the new ultra-clean fuels.
The US is opposed to the project as it is a means for Iran to build up its economic infrastructure. Not to mention the US wants leverage over China by way of controlling the flow of oil.
In a world that runs on oil, the nation that controls the flow of oil has great strategic power. U.S. policy-makers want leverage over the economies of competitors -- Western Europe, Japan and China -- that are more dependent on Middle Eastern oil. #msg-4798276
Washington policy now encompasses a series of "democratic" or soft coup projects which would strategically cut China off from access to the vital oil and gas reserves of the Caspian, including Kazakhstan. The earlier Asian Great Silk Road trade routes went through Tashkent in Uzbekistan and Almaty in Kazakhstan for geographically obvious reasons, in a region surrounded by major mountain ranges.
Geopolitical control of Uzbekistan, Kyrgystan and Kazakhstan would enable control of any potential pipeline routes between China and Central Asia, just as the encirclement of Russia allows for the control of pipeline and other ties between it and Western Europe, China, India and the Mideast. #msg-6825938
-Am
China may join Iran-Pak-India gas pipeline SAIBAL DASGUPTA
TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ THURSDAY, AUGUST 11, 2005 10:32:43 PM ]
Citibank NRI Offer
BEIJING: Officials of the petroleum ministries of India and China are engaged in a serious dialogue about the possibility of Chinese participation in the India-Iran gas pipeline. The matter involves sensitive foreign policy issues as US is opposed to the project.
The two sides also discussed the recent withdrawal of the bid to acquire US energy firm Unocal by the China National Offshore Oil Corporation. Chinese officials explained the country’s viewpoint with regard to the aborted acquisition, and expressed unhappiness about the outcome of their efforts, sources said.
"Both sides are assessing implications of this issue. We are trying to find out what lessons learn from this episode," Talmiz Ahmad, additional secretary (international co-operation) in ministry of petroleum and natural gas, said. He is leading a seven-member Indian delegation for four days.
On its part, the US is opposed to the idea of any country helping Iran to build up its economic infrastructure. The US has said that it would take action against any country helping Iran until the later changes its policies concerning terrorism, sources said.
Indian and Chinese officials have begun working on a MoU on extensive co-operation in the energy sector including joint participation in projects. The discussion also covers the possibility of Chinese participation in the India-Iran pipeline project.
The two countries are working on a draft memorandum of understanding on extensive cooperation on energy security including the possibility of jointly participating in projects. They expect to sign by year end.
The China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), another state-run Chinese company, is particularly interested in participating in the project. The CNPC is at present engaged in construction of the 998-km China-Kazakhstan oil pipeline, which is scheduled by year end.
The proposed gas pipeline is seen by some as a policy initiative to bring the countries in the region closer to each other, and possibly counter US influence in the region. The Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had earlier told Parliament that US has no influence over the fate of Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline.