News Focus
News Focus
icon url

longnsteady

08/18/11 8:55 AM

#29029 RE: manshoon1 #29028

"Due to the CSC requirement as part of the deal:

1. KBLB gives a 20 percent discount to CSC-FACT (not disputed as fact,never has been)
2. KBLB has to maintain IR related to CSC -FACT (not disputed as fact, never has been)

under condition 1, 11.8 million shares were exchanged for 545 ,000 in cash
under condition 2, 30 million shares were given to maintain qualitystocks, and now Ben hansel as part of the agreement.

Total costs 41.8 million shares, in return= 545 ,000 cash."

Well seeing that you are one for getting the facts straight let's ponder your statement. I have seen you use this example several times. So your assumption is that KBLB has issued 41.8 million shares for $545,000 cash and nothing more. You see this is where you are mistaken....the additional 30 million shares you so enjoy to include in your voodoo math were for services and future services rendered. In your misguided figures and computations you give no monetary value to the services provided by the IR person or firm for the services they have provided to the company. You also have to remember that when those 30 million shares were issued the stock was trading around $0.01/share. You see where I am going with this????? You have conveniently left out $300,000 for services rendered by the IR person and firm. Thus, the correct figure is that 41.8 million shares have been issued for $545,000 cash and $300,000 for services and future services rendered.
icon url

longnsteady

08/18/11 9:35 AM

#29032 RE: manshoon1 #29028

"our licenser of zfn tech is trading at roughly 7-8 times NEXT YEARS EARNINGS . That is not potential, that is next years earnings..........based on proven performance and guidance issued by the company."

Really???? That's how you understand it.....as next years earnings????? Do you have a crystal ball and are able to see in the future....hahahaha....now I am beginning to understand where this voodoo math is coming from....the P/E ratio is based on current earnings not off what some gypsy sees in her crystal ball.

"If KBLB was trading on pure potential and none of that evil pumping I allege, then..........I guess KBLB has 1/2 the potential it had in June or 35 percent of the potential it had on september 28 th 2010 ??"

If you haven't noticed the evil pumping you are alleging has done very little if anything to influence the pps lately. So kblb is trading at what the free market values it at. Do you think that the value that kblb is trading at now may have something to do with the potential value of Monstersilk? Heaven forbid that the company actually has a product that would justify its current pps. So go ahead with your shallow thinking and conspiracy theories if it brings you comfort. I am going to continue waiting patiently for kblb to complete its journey, again I am eagerly waiting to have that discussion with you when the journey is completed. Good luck to you.