So how hard is it to figure out that Dean is a lying scumbag politician like all the rest?? As an election year promise he says he is against the war. Then he gets offered a position in the Democratic party and the bought out scum bag now supports the occupation. We are not talking rocket science here. It is a pretty simple observation.
but Dean was AGAINST the war, he said Saddam wasn't a threat... so he was right... just like Richard Clarke and Rand Beers said the Iraq war would be counterproductive
even Powell and other Military experts warned it would be costly and counterproductive
but now the damage is done... the IDIOTS in charge opened the can of worms, and now that we have invested billions of $'s and thousands of lives, should we just pull out and leave, like they did the last Gulf War, and stood by while Saddam massacred his own people
he's right... we broke it and now we damn well better fix it
You accuse me of not making sense? WOW! Your argument only makes sense if DEAN said he was against the war BEFORE the war started and then changed his position AFTER the war commenced. I am seriously jet lagged at the moment so maybe I am having serious memory problems but I do believe We already invaded Iraq before the Election. No?
So Dean said he was against the war during the war and then later in the war changed his position. What part of election year promise is so hard to understand?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
