News Focus
News Focus
icon url

cents2ks

08/10/11 7:15 PM

#327257 RE: uzualsuzpect #327255

it sure the hell is a monkey wrench, I see it as a DESPERATE attempt to delay...again...

JMW, stop this charade NOW! Every time this prick files another stack of worthless crap, it costs OUR estate another 100+mil... end this BS now the freaking company belongs to the SHAREHOLDERS DAMNIT!!!
icon url

DPincus

08/10/11 7:20 PM

#327260 RE: uzualsuzpect #327255

I don't see how this would cause a delay in the timetable as set. Unless I'm not reading it closely enough, there is not much contained in this "modification" to the modified plan that would cause counsel - with the exception perhaps of Dime warrant holders - to argue/file objections and thus require rescheduling of written closing arguments' deadlines , or judge's written opinion, being pushed back.

It's just some more milking of the estate, as far as I can tell. Hopefully, this too gets chalked up to the litany of motions for clawback of fees.

Dion
icon url

drkazmd65

08/10/11 8:03 PM

#327280 RE: uzualsuzpect #327255

Can they even do that? Will the judge toss the gavel at them?

And - if the modification is in any way significant - how is it that they don't have to put it to a vote again?
icon url

wamuvoodoo

08/10/11 11:26 PM

#327334 RE: uzualsuzpect #327255

uz you worry too much