IB, Actually, I am very surprised. I was under the impression that almost all of Intel's processor production was at 90 nm and therefore assumed that most of the Xeon's sold were 64-bit enabled (outside of replacement product).
That's the "nuance" that I didn't feel like pursuing. I'm pretty sure Intel continues to sell many 32-bit Xeons, but I'm not sure the author of that article intended to make a distinction between 32-bit and 64-bit Xeons.
Of course, I can assume anything I want, but unlike Dan, I'm actually interested in the truth.
Tenchu