News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Alex G

06/06/05 8:07 PM

#110285 RE: w0zz #110282

i knew your response would be exactly THAT... a typical jingoistic non-response: "war is hell"

i'm reposting part of the original post from here http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=1878

if you don't agree with this then you're problem is you're a moral cripple


"It doesn’t matter that our terrorist enemies are evil. It doesn’t matter what they do to their prisoners, in terms of beheading, or what have you. We don’t judge our behavior by the standards of barbarians. We judge it by our own standards, and, so far, it looks like we haven’t been doing as good a job as we should of living up to those standards. Pointing that out somehow makes me Andrew Sullivan. Well, that’s fine. I’d rather be Andrew Sullivan than a moral cripple. Some of you appear content to be the latter.

Now, you can bitch and moan that some lefty cartoonist makes the military look bad. But, if you’re honest, you have to acknowledge that if the military wasn’t, in fact, torturing and murdering any prisoners, the snide little cartoonist wouldn’t be able to draw his little cartoon. And, when our guys are torturing prisoners to death, then the cartoon, no matter how distasteful you find it, has some relevance, and, indeed, some truth. [...]

It is to our credit that CID is looking into this stuff, and pressing criminal charges. But something is causing entire units to mistreat prisoners, torture them, and kill them. And let’s not hide behind any of this “Well, if it’s needed to stop another 9/11...” crap. Clearly, in the cases cited so far, it wasn’t necessary. It was being done at places like Bagram because the interrogators made it regular practice. Why? How did it become regular practice? I guarantee it wasn’t because some Staff Sergeant exceeded his authority. And, while we’re on the subject, why was the CID’s initial work at Bagram so shoddy that CID headquarters had the investigation reassigned from local CID agents and given to a team in Virginia? Apparently, some of our guys feel perfectly comfortable engaging in barbarism. Since there are no bad troops, only bad leadership, I have to wonder how complicit the chain of command is, at least at the local level, at turning a blind eye to this stuff.

Murdering prisoners is wrong. Period. Torturing prisoners is wrong. Period. Those are, in fact, supposed to be the types of principles that separate us from the terrorists."


icon url

Alex G

06/06/05 8:24 PM

#110288 RE: w0zz #110282

>>Where was Amnesty International (or the UN for that matter) during Saddam's reign in Iraq<<
__________________


of course AI was reporting on it... and Rumsfeld & Cheney quoted AI to bolster support for their war in Iraq... then, when AI reports on wrongdoings by the US Cheney says "i don't take them seriously"... blatant hypocrisy #msg-6526807

this comment of yours: "It is not a debating society" is quite strange... we are not a "debating society"???... that sounds a bit fascist... are you in tune with the "real" god?, so we don't need to dabate anything?
icon url

webster groves

06/06/05 10:08 PM

#110296 RE: w0zz #110282

<contemplate the literally millions of lives that could have been saved if action against Hitler had been taken sooner.>

Are you advocating violence against the President?
That is a nono.

wg