Replies to post #21283 on Colorado Goldfields Inc (fka CGFI)

[vietnam67]

Ficose, this guy is from yahoo. Your right he doesn't HAVE HIS FACTS. its just B.S. They come and go, but we are are still hear and strong. Go CGFIA. ANYDAY NOW

[lilpuppy6]

Difference is "NAK" PROVED "SIGNIFICANT" and ongoing RESOURCES.

This is the universal law regarding micro mining companies. Prove big, get BIG pps movements.

Prove small resources, won't give you much pps momo..maybe a double..or triple if you are lucky :(

Do you believe CGFIA can prove "BILLIONS" in thier claims?

I don't see any data to suggest such a thing.
TIA