News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TRCPA

07/26/11 4:04 PM

#33359 RE: troutkinglives #33357

troutkinglives.....indeed it would have. And the names associated with FASC seem to keep getting bigger all of the time.
icon url

sunspotter

07/27/11 3:39 AM

#33365 RE: troutkinglives #33357

"10 years ago it would have been considered crazy dreamin' to imagine FASC would have connections to companies such as QL and PWR. My, how times have changed."

Indeed times have changed. Ten years ago, the pps for FASC was multiples of what it is now, at 10 cents:

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/historical/default.asp?symb=fasc&closeDate=7%2F27%2F01&x=26&y=21

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=FASC&insttype=Stock&freq=2&show=&time=13

Add in the cost of money over the past decade, and that fall of over 75% is a somewhat sad return on "investment".

Over the long term, Mr. Market gets it about right, even if he is somewhat bipolar on a short-term basis.

And for the last few years, Mr. Market is saying that FASC is essentially worthless.

And even with all the exhaustive (and I imagine exhausting) straw-clutching that goes on here and elsewhere, Mr. Market is clearly essentially correct.