InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

fourkids_9pets

07/15/11 3:24 PM

#98329 RE: Santa Barbara Broker #98328

hmmm

funny how mgmt clearly articulated all along
what was happening and when .. what is clear
is *few* understood what it means to invest
in an unregistered co. *trading* on the OTC

expo holdings is totally legit .. but like
many b4 them that came public via the SEC
sanctioned R/M .. they become *prey* the
moment they *trade* on the pks <june 2007>


it's why my very first posts in this venue
commented on the *manipulation* endemic
in the tape .. it was clearly visible but
it's the rule not the exception

==

what i would love to see is the info on the
shares *not* reconciled and whose firm they
get traced back to ;-)

i already know the MMs' *complicit* via the
hand offs and MONOPOLY .. suspect one clearing
house is also mired up to their eye balls in the muck
that is unfolding

should be an interesting time ahead for all

==
4kids
all jmo

icon url

venomen2002

07/15/11 4:01 PM

#98336 RE: Santa Barbara Broker #98328

Yeah I like the honesty as well..

From May after they were informed..

"April Sales up 365%"

and..

"Sales for the month of April 2011 were approximately $170,000 compared to approximately $36,400 in April 2010. This figure does not include approximately $75,000 in deposits received in April 2011 (for projects in process) as deposits are booked as a liabilities until the orders are completed and the billing process is completed. The company typically requests a 10% (or more) deposit for orders over $10,000 in size."

and..

"The company has raised funds via its stock in early 2011 as well as during 2010. The company anticipates no additional stock issuances now or in the foreseeable future and has no plans or considerations for a reverse stock split."

Thanks for pointing out how honest they have been...veno