Replies to post #318514 on Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[UncleBo]

Because...it holds the truth. I think, Rosie has AMNESIA, we have to cordially remind him that one of his shiaty palns, not so long ago, contained a "Rights Offering" and this is a very, very real thing for the New Co, NOT A SPECULATION. I would be utterly disgusted if the judge even allows him to utter arguments on that - MOTION DENIED !!! (if you ask a reasonable person )

[xoom]

Lawrence
I think the debtors just shot themselves in the foot OUCH,
by highlighting the fact that PJS/BDO numbers are HUGE
Thank You Debtors... now we ALL would like to see those numbers....
Game on.......

JMHO
GLTA

[SAPer]

I found this article. Here is an excerpt. Let's hope it is because of #2. But knowing Rosen it will be something like 8 or 14.

Full Article..
http://www.ndialonestar.com/Articles/Motion%20in%20Limine.pdf

Case law is full of examples of motions
in limine being successfully argued to
preclude the introduction of evidence as
being improper due to various reasons, such
as (1) privilege,17 (2) settlement discussions,
(3) proof of inadmissible character
evidence, (4) pleadings in court regarding
estimated future claims, (5) extrinsic
evidence of unambiguous document, (6)use of depositions from another proceeding, (7) use of a transcript from a prior
proceeding,(8) exclusion of expert
testimony on divorce law, (9) limiting the
use of hearsay evidence, (10) affidavits,
(11) exculpatory clauses contained in service
orders and work tickets, (12) new damage
theories, (13) evidence of state of mind of a
civil contemnor and (14) limiting evidence
and arguments under §523(a)(7) because no
facts had been pled to warrant consideration.