Personally, I think wise investing includes BOTH fundamental and technical analysis. For example, I'm here mainly because of the fundamental potential of this company, but choose to do most of my buying when the technicals tell me I'm getting a good deal - like when the RSI has settled in the low 30's in the absence of "bad" news.
When this spiked to .20, a healthy technical pullback would have been no more than 40% of the gain, or about 7 cents, taking the price down to 0.13. It was the technical picture that took this to .20 in the first place. But there was no significant fundamental news to follow up on, so the technicals broke down and we saw 2 cents again. The lack of significant fundamental news, combined with a technical breakdown (or at least the technicals not responding to fundamental news) caused me to have a 10 month period where I did not buy a single share. There was no real bad news, except maybe the CTO, so I didn't sell any either and now I'm better off for it.
SRSR has great potential, but has been somewhat handicapped mainly by being on the pink sheets, significant news releases being few and far between, and to a lesser extent by having a fairly large float. I sense this fundamental "news" issue will change sometime this year, but we have to have a positive technical response to it for any sustainability.
Don't know what comes first, the chicken or the egg, but it's pretty clear to me that we need em' both.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
