It is the same process in which evidence was presented against Casey Anthony. Evidence was tainted and misleading and the defense was able to present a better case that got her off.
I think what everyone is concerned is that how can we present something when we know there has been a theft and the information is there, but hidden from us.
The judge allows for the lack of information and yet when it does appear before her she fumbles through it.
we are trying to prove IT, for this the GSA should be denied, but will be able to provide enough evidence.
SG will not be there, he has yet to show up when needed, he is needed now. If his presence is there, we have a good chance at this.
TPS are pulling all the stops (Sterns) gives more options. I would like nothing more than to see BR down for the count, especially on explanation on the hours he posted.
There is so much fruad, but he who has the money can make the rules. SEC will find JPM, FDIC did do things wrong and fines will be given and shareholders will still get nothing.
Fraud is the key here. If there is a hint of it and the Judge sees it, then the waterfall will fall for everyone. Including RICO, if the 29billion did actually exist on documentation also look for appearances by one or two of the individuals the FDIC was trying to sue.
Nelson was right, there was 29billion and that should have been included A>L exists and someone has the record, now can we have it.
Market Data 
Markets 
