You notice the real longs here are not panicking because we have not been updated constantly on the behind the scenes matters this company is working on.
The real longs....hmmmm. How exactly do you become a "real long"? Is it by pretending all is well when our money is circling the drain? Is it by praising a CEO that makes comments to shift the blame from himself to the SEC? I guess I am not a "real" long. And are the "real" longs panicking--regardless of the bravado shown on this board, I bet they are panicking.
It's juvenile to think or demand this timeline to fix these issues should be any shorter then the reality.
I never read anyone demand these issues be fixed in a shorter period of time then reality?? For the shareholders who have kept LLEG afloat, demanding an explanation is anything but juvenile, it is imperative.
Mike has made a PR that was professional and honest...if some shareholders don't like it...then they always have the option to sell and move on.
Which PR was that?? The one that said nothing or the one blaming the SEC, cartoons, and the web site?? And we do not have the option of selling and moving on since our management got us kicked down to the greys.
Longs know from intelligent DD that Mike is not a fly by night CEO and part of that is not releasing useless PR's to hold the hands of a few with just fluff PR's.
Never said he was a fly by night CEO--I think he made some mistakes and stretched the truth in the financials. I do however feel he owes his shareholders an explanation, afterall his actions cost us tens of thousands of dollars. I guess you "real longs" don't care what he really did to cause the SEC action, but us regular shareholders need to know what happened, and how it is being corrected. You can call it a fluff PR, I call it his obligation to his shareholders.
I've said before this is gut check time for the true shareholders....to throw tantrums thinking it will solve this situation is a waste of time.
Are "true shareholders" the same as "real longs"? Are you saying that my demanding answers from the CEO of the company that has cost me tens of thousands of dollars is "throwing a tantrum?" Does "gut check" time mean it is time to pretend all is well even though your gut is telling you it is not?
I know I personally bought shares here based on my DD and no one else's, so if I turn out wrong on this then I need to find a mirror to look at the person who would be responsible for that error.
I also bought these shares after doing my own DD. I also broke several of my personal investing rules when I jumped in to LLEG, but I bought on a hunch. At the end of the day I knew it was a risk and could only blame myself if it didn't pan out. Until of course the CEO gets us suspended. If the company lost money on its own merit, I could live with that. But in this case the face that is responsible is that of MBB, not the face in the mirror.
MIKE DOES NOT HAVE MY TRUST BECAUSE HE HAS LOST IT!!!