News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Montana Wildhack

06/29/11 4:44 PM

#238811 RE: joecanouse #238806

Thanks for the clarification then - and your answer to the 504 and issuance of stock at .001 was what you didn't know then? Have you found how many shares you received at .001 yet?
icon url

marc_1958

06/29/11 5:25 PM

#238816 RE: joecanouse #238806

Joe, Sure wish there would have been more time to ask more than the 3 or 4 questions that I was able to get through with.

But really now, you as the might be CEO(hell I don't know anymore than you really do) does not in any way see a conflict of interest concerning other business dealings with Dean Bradley(money,help,100 million shares,etc)???

After all the accusations concerning Dean (and sometimes yourself) and him stepping down you really don't see a conflict concerning Donnell,who I spoke with on quite a few occasions while she worked for Dean at Quasar and right after the Dean fiasco. But now she works for Quasar and other companies connected with Dean???

Seems like if Dean was right beside you,picking your pocket and you felt something funny you might still be unbiased!!

Sure hope things are not really like they seem!!

I hope this doesn't take months or years to get this all sorted out for all of our sakes!!!
icon url

Montana Wildhack

06/29/11 9:08 PM

#238831 RE: joecanouse #238806

Since your debt wraps were based on accrued wages and it clearly stated in the merger agreement that none of the company officials at the time of the merger had employee agreements and since your wife did the financials and those did not reflect any accrued wages, how is it that millions of dollars in accrued wages got past her filings but yet you were able to do debt wraps based on accrued wages?