My understanding was they had already tested in an Airship but the new test were to be done in a helicopter.
QASP had committed to pay for the demo.
I can't imagine $1kk plus to transfer an already tested technology from one vehicle to another.
I'm also puzzled by Mr. Kendrick remarks making light of a QASP shareholder verifying the demo date.
Doesn't MS verify the references and work background of its job applicants? And if they do, what happens if one of the references they attempt to contact is discovered to have passed a few days earlier?
From what I recall the shareholder discovered that a demo had never been scheduled for the time PR'd, but instead found a tentative date was being scheduled several months out, Oct as I recall.
It looked to me as though MS got caught with their pants down and tried to create a diversion by refocusing the attention onto the shareholder's action.