Replies to post #35070 on Rim Semiconductor Company (fka RSMI)

[excel]

The only one with half truths is you.
Once again learn to follow a thread.

Here is proof AGAIN you are wrong.

I have more important matters to attend to today then the type of ignorance displayed by someone who can't follow the thread of discussion.



http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=6462380

Maybe you could answer financial statements made that Iown decided to spin back towards my personal life making it an OT post?

You knew EXACTLY what I was talking about.
Statements I made regarding them getting financing was the topic I presented to Iown.
It was obviuos to everyone but you.
Though like a child you want to play games.
I suggest tryoing to show some maturity if you are going to want to continue to debate on message boards.







Once again here they are for you.................

The financial statements made by me which were refused to be answered as answering them would reveal the truth.

http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=6460283

I agree there is good and bad.

I just believe if they had what they said they did it would only make sense they would find funding that works.

I also believe their agenda showed when they did receive funding how they spent it.

If you are a company and see someone else that has a way to expand your profit margin by a huge amount would the excuse brad gives time and time again of bad funding deals make sense?

Would it make sense for the other companies not to partner up with NV in bringing it to market?

Would they year after year knowing that profit margin exists ignore it?

I think we all know the answer to that.

Look at MSFT and the wars they've had with Intel, Sun, and others yet when it makes sense money wise, boom, all is forgiven for just long enough to sign whatever deal makes them both more money.

[excel]

One more thing. Below is where I got the days mixed up with the 45 day number. It was exactly what i posted about how I could have been wrong mixing up the numbers.

NT agreed with me on the 45 days also. He was mixed up also.
So I guess according to you NT was using "scare tactics" also.
I wonder why you didn't inform him?

Oh well, maybe next time you'll stop with so much hate towards me and look at the fact I said I could be wrong which I said in my post to you.

I'll wait for your comments in regards to financing I copied for you in last post.

Maybe you can debate NV instead of taking every post off the subject and turning it personal.

One more thing. In regards to the below.
You all have the right to bring up any matters to vote on the way I read this even after 45 day deadline due to no meeting last year and no official announcement this year.

You can find this info from Jarods link in his last post as you'll need more than what is below to understand.

I highly suggest you get together and try to get some type of accountibility out of the current management.

(c) A proxy may confer discretionary authority to vote on any of the following matters:


(1) For an annual meeting of shareholders, if the registrant did not have notice of the matter at least 45 days before the date on which the registrant first mailed its proxy materials for the prior year's annual meeting of shareholders (or date specified by an advance notice provision), and a specific statement to that effect is made in the proxy statement or form of proxy. If during the prior year the registrant did not hold an annual meeting, or if the date of the meeting has changed more than 30 days from the prior year, then notice must not have been received a reasonable time before the registrant mails its proxy materials for the current year.