News Focus
News Focus
icon url

tommy 9 fingers

06/21/11 10:18 AM

#1235 RE: hedge_fun #1234

"This agreement does not legally bind either party, but represents the intent of both parties to further their mutual interests."

How is it in DP's mutual intertest is to use or to convince someone else to use GKG when the CEO of the company with the GKG is bankrupting the company by taking an excessive salary and can't pay his debt as it is, much less does not have terms on the license to the grass in the first place

And at anytime that same CEO can loose the company to the lender Chang. OR China could just simply shut them down not allowing export of the grass... or the possibility of an SEC investigation and sanction of the company for possible violations of PUMP and DUMP rules or misleading PR's.... What happens to the GKG if that happens? Or much less any contract DP would or could Sign.

Gee I wonder if the many e-mails sent to DP verify the copy in Carls PR's has caught thier attention and that's why the MOU was not extended?

I also wonder if DP employees have been paid in VSPC stock or play this stock.

I wonder who hired the third party to promote the stock and if you look at the historical volume history you will see increase volume during the one week period that third party promotion took place....and also we saw the biofuel database appear on DP website during that same week or the third party promotion ........... LOOKs like a dump to me