Replies to post #97026 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[cantgetmyname]

Wow!! It was over .01 then. And with all those great things happening it is now a triple zero, non reporting pinky.

[fourkids_9pets]

you know i was just reading that old
post due to the search on so. comm bank
crestmark .. and WACHOVIA ..

regardless the post was of interest ..
for 2 reasons besides the quality of
expo's customers and banking relationships

the date

it was posted just after mgmt uploaded fins
and right b4 the CC that was held on july 28th :)

to say nothing of when historical pps and *volume*
has to show

==
4kids
all jmo

[Renee]

And that repost of mine from July 2009 shows absolutely how EXPO Holdings pumped their stock to over .03 cents on verifiably FALSE and MISLEADING news releases as confirmed in their 2009 Financials and the derelict absence of any PROOF of any of those earth-shattering news releases since that time.

Yes indeedy, JS, once upon a time I believed that EXPO Holdings would be different than all the other Pink Sheet scams. To my great embarrassment I advocated for this company and stock, realizing after September 15th, 2009 that EXPO Holdings was one of the most brilliantly executed SCAMS on the entire Pink Sheets System.

False, misleading, and greatly embellished news releases in 2009 so that the insiders could sell vast amounts of their insider shares for between $8 million to $24 million dollars.....and I unwittingly helped them by my positive advocacy. Now others have picked up the baton of positive advocacy despite overwhelming evidence that the stock is 100 % SCAM....evidence that wasn't known in 2009 but is clearly known now.

Not anymore, JS, I will shout from the mountaintops just how much of a SCAM this company and stock are.

Any more of my two year old posts you would like to repost?

[Santa Barbara Broker]

"Yep, seems to be an awful shame to some that they keep getting contracts with Fortune 500/100 companies. I think this excerpt from a old post explains why they continually get these contracts. Retail investors can do the Clint Eastwood thingy and ask themselves if they feel lucky with EXPH being a Pink Sheet stock . Lowes , Stanley Tool , Home Depot , Newell-Rubbermaid , Bosch Tool , Kronotex U.S.A. , Black & Decker, Westinghouse , Wachovia / S.Community and Crestmark Banks .....DON'T BET ON BEING LUCKY .....they execute on being SMART and exhaustively diligent"

Well, IMHO, that's all a total crock of misleading dung. Now, whether the method used to create the misleading crock of dung was "SMART" or not may well be determined if the people that created it manage to stay out of jail if they are ever caught. But that's another story.

I've been working on a little theory that I believe has more than a 90% chance of being proven true. It started with one of the infamous "photos of nothing" from one of the Expo set-up tours. It was of a pallet of Lowes displays...specifically part of the Lowes order, which were designated for "Kronotex USA". Hmmmmm. One of the companies Expo claimed to have produced an "order" for that was never heard from again. But Kronotex WAS selling products at Lowes. Hmmmmm Hmmmmm. Suddenly it dawned on me. There were a LOT of blue chip names Expo Holdings had claimed to be "doing business with" that were never heard from much after the initial P&D type PR releases. Stanley Tool, Newell-Rubbermaid, Bosch Tool, the aforementioned Kronotex U.S.A., more recently Armstrong Flooring and Black & Decker to name a few. And what do you know? All these names were PR'd or mentioned at least during the Lowes display order initial rumors or after Expo had started production. And all of them sell products through Lowes...Hmmmm, Hmmmm, HMMMMM. Gee, I sez to myself, I wonder if a disengenuous outfit like Expo Holdings desperate to produce PRs on anything that can show a blue chip name next to theirs in such a misleading release might be using the Lowes order that might be designating certain types of displays built for certain vendors and then PRing that they are actually doing BUSINESS with that VENDOR? Instead of just building displays for Lowes per Lowes specifications to display that vendors goods in Lowes stores? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM??????

Knowing JD Brown the way we all do, picture this (no pun intended). You have learned that Lowes' displays have to built to Lowes specs to fit the floor plans in their stores regardless of who displays their products on those displays. BUT, that any vendor wanting shelf space in a Lowes literally has to pay for that display shelf as part of the deal...a display which D&D Displays then builds for Lowes. So JD Brown sez...HMMMMMM and starts the infamous Expo rationalization. IN essence, D&D Displays and Expo are being paid by those vendors. So technically, I can issue a PR saying we are producing a display order for them. HMMMMMMMM!!!!!

Yeah well, not too diligent or smart IMHO if it's true, but it certainly would explain why they "keep getting "contracts" with all these "Fortune 500/100" companies"....but continually LOSE hundreds of thousands of dollars year after year after year. Now wouldn't it...Hmmmmmmm???? All IMHO