Replies to post #143459 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[SoxFan]

You site skeptics like Happer who are funded by big oil and is not an expert in climatology. I think I've discredited him in prior posts yet you cling to him like shit on a shoe.

As for Lindzen- he's meteorologist for crying out loud.

SO before I decimate his positions let me ask you -

Do you believe them? or do you believe the other 97% of climatologists who beleive if man made global warming?

Oh and let me state those who you mentioned aren't climatologists.

That's like asking a doctor of enlgish to do surgery because he has doctor in his name.

[fuagf]

kozuh, tut tut, you give only one link on Lindzen when you have so many more .. given to you 'bout 6 weeks ago ..

Shame on Richard Lindzen, MIT’s uber-hypocritical anti-scientific scientist
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2009/03/09/203788/richard-lindzen-heartland-denier/

Climate science disinformer Richard Lindzen accuses colleagues of “overt cheating”

Lindzen could not be more discredited:

* Lindzen debunked again: New scientific study finds his paper downplaying dangers of human-caused warming is “seriously in error”

* Re-discredited climate denialists in denial

* Science: “Clouds Appear to Be Big, Bad Player in Global Warming” — an amplifying feedback (sorry Lindzen and fellow deniers)
http://www.celsias.com/article/science-stunner-clouds-appear-be-big-bad-player-gl/

Richard S. Lindzen

<>http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Richard_S._Lindzen

http://www.alternet.org/environment/50494

.........here's a start for you Kozuh. .. sweet dreams

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=62606425 .. couple of 'gone bad' links changed ..

there's a 2nd start for you Kozuh. .. enjoy ..