syl, i did not blame every problem on clinton. i pointed out,
and i believe you would agree, that when foreign interests
misread weakness or flakiness the results can be deadly. for
your information, i am not blindly biased to any party or position (with the exception of my God and faith and <vbg> the
Green Bay Packers)
with all due respect your bald statement that Reagan and Bush
"armed" Saddam and Bin Laden is grossly simplistic, misleading
and nothing more than a "talking spin point." you know both
those situations were complex and multi-faceted and cannot be reduced to a one sentence spin argument. wasn't bin laden fighting off the communist soviet union at the time? how does your argument bear on the current subject of some here blaming bush for the NK dispute?
here's a question? do you think clinton expended as much time, effort and energy on the daily tasks of the office of president as bush does? did clinton have too many distractions
to deal with?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
